Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Willis, 10 June 1916
Private and Confidential 10th June 1916 My Dear Willis, Thank you for your letter of 7th, All you say is perfectly true, but our leaders have
made us acquainted at private meetings with an amazing and
alarming state of things which makes it impossible for us to take
the steps that most of us would like to take, and which, under
circumstances as presented by you we ought to take. It appears
that diplomatic complications of a very serious sort have convinced
the whole Cabinet, including the Unionist Members, that it is
necessary to give John Redmond some form of Home Rule to come
into operation at once. The whole Unionist Press with the
exception of the "Morning Post" has taken up the cry that the
Irish question must be settled out of hand. The majority of
the Unionist Members of the House of Commons are now of the same
mind in spite of all our friends can say. The only life-buoy
that is visible in this hostile flood of things is a provisio
which even most of the Radical papers make, that "Ulster must not
be coerced." The only question before us here at present is,
shall we authorise arson to enter into conference with Redmond
and Co. for a settlement on the basis of the exclusion of six
counties in Ulster, with regard to which Lloyd George professes
to have arrived at a preliminary tentative agreement. In the
present state of British public opinion it is clear that whichever
party refuses to treat on the basis of Lloyd George's proposals
will incur odium and diminish its chances of getting anything 2 it wants in the future . If Carson receives the authority of the Unionist
Council to treat on this basis it will, of course, be understood
that he will make the best bargain he can as regards details
and safeguards for the minority in the part of Ireland not
excluded from the Home Rule Act. The Unionist Council with
whom the decision in this matter rests is a very diplomatic democratic
body, and it will be impossible to raise landlord points there.
If the Unionist Council on Monday decide to accept the proposed
basis of negotiations Redmond will still have to get his supporters
to do the same, and to me it appears that the establishment of
Home Rule is still some way off. Of course on the face of it, the mere proposal that Home
Rule should be granted now as a consequence of the Rebellion looks
like sheer lunacy. The reasons behind the curtain which have
induced Walter Long and Bonor Law Law & & a Chamberlain to agree to this apparently
mad step must have been of extraordinary force. Of course if
the country was ruled by a Pitt instead of an Asquith a very
different course would have been pursued, but we must take facts
as they are. I think the landlords must sit tight for the present,
but I agree with you that as soon as it appears to be settled that
an Amending Bill to the Home Rule Act now on the Statute Book is
to be brought at once, we should have an emergency meeting
to see whether it is possible to get anything inserted in this
Amending Bill on the point you mention or others to save land
lords from ruin. Yours very truly,
This a letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery (1844-1924) to a Mr Willis. Originally a liberal and a strong supporter of Gladstone, Montgomery was also a firm Unionist, but by 1916 he believed that Ulster Unionists had no choice but to accept Lloyd George's proposal for a six-county Northern Ireland. In the letter, Montgomery discusses the threat of Home Rule in Ireland, stating that the Unionist MPs have accepted that John Redmond (1953-1918), Irish Parliamentary Party leader, will gain some form of Home Rule in Ireland. The letter also states that this is even being accepted by radical Unionist newspapers who call for Ulster to be excluded from an Ireland with Home Rule. It goes on to state that Carson should be encouraged to to enter discussions to prevent Ulster being part of and Ireland with Home Rule. Montgomery also describes the granting of Home Rule following the Easter Rising as an act of lunacy, naming Walter Long (1854-1926) and Bonar Law (1858-1923), Unionist members of parliament, as being effected by the lunacy. The letter ends suggesting an emergency meeting should be held to discuss the matters and propose an amendment to the Home Rule Bill to prevent landlords from being ruined.
- Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery
- Willis
- 1916-06-10
- Politics
How to cite
Letters 1916, published by the Austrian Centre for Digital Humanities, Vienna, 2026 (https://letters1916static.github.io/letters1916-static/item__2231.html)
- Mentioned in
-
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to William Coote, 25 March 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenerg Montgomery to Edward Carson, 31 May 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Edward Carson, 9 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Willis, 10 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Edward Carson, 9 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to 'Canon', 10 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to W. G. Vance, 13 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Vernon, 15 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Willis, 15 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Hamilton, 10 June 1916
- Letter to Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery from Walter Long, 2 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to George Francis Stewart, 17 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to James Stronge, 3 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to John Edward Fowler Sclater, 3 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to James Stronge, 9 June 1916.
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Mr Glasgow, 18 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to George Francis Stewart, 18 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Hugo, 27 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Maurice Headlam, 19 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery, 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Charles Hubert Montgomery, 30 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to William Hovenden Ffolliott, 2 August 1916
- Letter from Charles Hubert Montgomery to Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery, 29 May 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to John Ross, 27 May 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to William Coote, 27 May 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to William Coote, 22 May 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Waldron, 26 June 1916
- Letter to Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery from Sir John Ross, 2 June 1916.
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Sir Richard Dawson Bates, 23 June 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to William Coote, 9 Spetember 1916
- Letter from Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery to Walter Long, 31 May 1916
- Letter from M. E. Sinclair to Hugh de Fellenberg Montgomery, 18 September 1916